Pin Down Your Stance Before Diving-in…
Do you crave to turn into a Doctorate in your discipline? Selection of a potentially ingenious Ph.D research topic alone may not get you the feat. Many researchers and even Ph.D scholars have been ensnared within the praxis of good topic selection and running behind the outcome, based on standard modus operandi. Once the outcome is practically obtained, you may reckon that you have crossed up to 90% in your doctoral boulevard. But, indeed you may be just across the 6th lap, out of 10. What do I connote? The fact is that outcomes are not exactly the results with interpretations. Results which are not interpreted clearly bamboozle your write-up beyond a shadow of doubt. Also, it may pull you back on your way to the Holy Grail triumph – The Doctoral Award.
Plagiarism: The Prime Impediment?
Ethical fish-out and acknowledgement is not plagiarism…
Utilizing a limited part of an author’s research interpretation or hypothesis through proper acknowledgement is allowed globally. But, you could not take it granted and thus, can’t “copy and paste” any voluminous data from other authors to make a ‘thesis bloat’.
Keep it in mind! You need just the information and the words. How to take out someone’s content without escalating a plagiarism issue?
- Make a meticulous literature review.
- Collect the top-notch contents from the literature pool.
- Read, understand and prepare clues from the content source.
- Develop the hint in your own words.
- Make use of the thesaurus websites or MS-Word synonyms option.
- Use your creativity to amalgamate the concepts.
- Rewrite the developed sentence to ascertain relevance with the context.
Follow this and see! Your write-up is sure to depict a fresh face with the same information.
What is an Adjudicator’s Standpoint?
Though plagiarism-free writing is a crucial directive, a good topic embellished with fascinating words would be still inadequate to satisfy your Ph.D thesis adjudicator. If so, what presentation could please your reviewer?
Say no to fiction! Any Ph.D Thesis must ‘justify’ a focused hypothesis and thus fictions would not add value to your work.
Not mere addition! Your thesis work should not be a simple addition of the existing research data.
Innovate to impress! Your thesis must be designed in an innovative dimension and it must carry the evidences to ascertain the scope of a notion either with a positive or negative conclusion.
Keep literature up to date! Whether your research study embraces all the essential and recent literatures pertinent to the thesis; this is also a crucial consideration point.
Standard protocol: The protocols used in the research work must be based on well-established research data.
Justification: The underpinning reasons for the major research outcomes must be evaluated and discussed with supportive literatures.
Language: The whole thesis must be free from errors on grammar, vocabulary, style, etc. Even punctuations must be perfect enough to bolster the quality of your thesis.